From the Politics category

by Alice Ibarra in Politics

Multiple reports and accusations surround Donald Trump, focusing on his connection to Jeffrey Epstein. A new report details an Epstein accuser's claim that she informed the FBI twice about Trump's ties to Epstein, recounting a troubling encounter at Epstein's office. The White House denies Trump's presence. Amidst this, Trump promotes an AI-generated video depicting Obama's arrest, fueled by Tulsi Gabbard's claims of a treasonous conspiracy. Simultaneously, Trump deflects criticism regarding his administration's handling of the Epstein case, even boasting about his first six months in office. Further, a former Epstein lawyer advocates for Ghislaine Maxwell's release to testify. The Wall Street Journal faces Trump's ire over a report detailing a bawdy birthday card. Democrats largely dismiss Trump's attempts to shift blame for the Epstein fallout, while Trump's allies continue to push conspiracy theories. A report also surfaces detailing a party hosted by Trump where Epstein was the only other guest.


by Andrew Ismail in Politics

President Donald Trump intensified his call for the Washington Commanders to reinstate their former name, "Redskins," on Sunday. He threatened to impede the NFL team's stadium agreement if they don't comply, although his ability to do so remains unclear. Trump's statement on Truth Social indicated that he might restrict the stadium deal unless the name is changed. He believes the team would be more valuable and the deal more appealing with the original name. The Commanders relocated to Landover, Maryland, in 1997, but a deal was announced in April to return them to Washington D.C. at the site of the old Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium. Trump initially supported the deal, but its progress before the D.C. Council is currently stalled. Mayor Muriel Bowser urged the Council to expedite the process, noting the Commanders' eagerness. Public testimony hearings on the stadium redevelopment plan are scheduled for July 29. Trump previously expressed willingness to assist if the Council rejects the deal, citing the federal government's ultimate control over the RFK site. Congress passed a bill in late 2024 transferring ownership of the RFK site to the district's government. Trump praised the Commanders' owner and expressed confidence in the stadium's potential success. Earlier in his Sunday posts, Trump referred to the team as the "Washington 'Whatever's'" and demanded an immediate name change. While acknowledging the controversy surrounding the Redskins name, Trump previously suggested that winning could make the Commanders name acceptable. Trump also pressured the Cleveland Guardians to revert to their former name, "Indians," claiming that Native Americans desire the change. He argued that times have changed, and the current names disregard the heritage and prestige of Native Americans. Trump linked the Guardians' name change to the Cleveland owner's electoral losses, suggesting a name change could improve his chances. The Washington team dropped the "Redskins" name in 2020 due to criticism from Native American groups who considered it an ethnic slur. The Cleveland team changed its name in 2021 for similar reasons. CNN reached out to both teams and the D.C. mayor's office for comment.


by Alex Ingram in Politics

In the first six months of his second term, Donald Trump has dominated the national political conversation, implemented an aggressive agenda of constitutional reform, scrambled longstanding American alliances, and helped alter US political culture. Pro-democracy forces have been left with their heads spinning. They (and I) have spent too much time simply denouncing or pathologizing him and far too little time learning from him. And there is a lot to learn. Not since the middle of the twentieth century, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt led a constitutional revolution, has any president achieved so much of his agenda in so short a time. But to recognize Trump’s political genius is not to say that it has been put to good use or that he has been a good president. Like others who see “connections and possibilities in circumstances that even people who are smart in conventional ways do not see,” the president has shown himself to be adept at reading the temper of the times, exploiting weaknesses in others, and assembling a coalition of the faithful that others would have never thought possible. What PittNews’ Grace Longworth wrote last September has been confirmed since he returned to the Oval Office. “Trump is not as crazy or dumb as his opposition would like to believe he is,” Longsworth said. Trump’s genius is demonstrated by his ability to transform “calamitous errors into political gold”. In the past six months, he has continued to do what he has done since he first appeared on the national political scene. From then until now, he has convinced millions of Americans to buy into his version of events and not to believe what they see with their eyes. Insurrectionists become patriots. Law-abiding immigrants become threats to America’s way of life. Journalists become “enemies of the people”. It’s magic. Of course, the last six months have not been all smooth sailing for the president, who is now embroiled in a controversy about releasing material about the child sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein. But Trump succeeds because he is undaunted by critics and unfazed by the kinds of barriers that would throw any ordinary politician off their game. When necessary, he makes things up and repeats them until what he says seems to be real. None of this is good for democracy. Trump has done what millions of Americans want done: transform the political system. He has not been afraid to call into question constitutional verities. The greatest, and most dangerous, achievement of the president’s first six months has been reshaping the balance of power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The president has activated a political movement that has produced what Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman describes as “constitutional moments.” In those moments, fundamental political change happens without any formal change in the language of the Constitution itself. “Normal politics is temporarily suspended in favor of a ‘constitutional politics,’ focused on fundamental principles.” Since January, the Trump administration’s actions have indeed focused the attention of the nation on such principles. Like it or not, Donald Trump is turning the constitution on its head, changing it from a Republican to an authoritarian document. And with every passing day, we see that transformation happening. The Republican majority in Congress seems eager to let the president reshape the constitution and take on functions that it clearly assigns to the legislature. Tariffs, Congress is supposed to decide. Dissolving executive departments, Congress is supposed to decide. War powers, they belong to Congress. But you’d never know any of that from the way the president has behaved since 20 January. The supreme court has followed suit, giving its blessing to his aggressive assertions of executive authority even when they violate the clear meaning of the constitution. The court even severely limited the role of the lower courts by denying them the right to issue nationwide injunctions to stop the president from acting illegally. Beyond Congress and the court, it seems clear that pro-democracy forces did not do all they could have to prepare for this moment. Trump’s opponents have not learned from Trump how to effectively counter his “constitutional moment”. So what can we do? We can learn from Trump the importance of telling a simple, understandable story and sticking to it. Pro-democracy forces need to pick a message and repeat it again and again to drive it home. There is surely no one in America who has not heard the phrase Make America Great Again and does not associate Maga with Trump. We can learn to appeal to national pride and drive home that national greatness requires addressing the daily experiences of ordinary Americans in language of the kind they use. Make America Affordable Again. Make America Work Again for Everyone. Think X, Instagram, and what works on a podcast. Pro-democracy forces can learn to be as determined and undaunted in defense of democracy as the president has been in his assault on it. Take off the gloves. Show your teeth, take no prisoners. Trump has shown that it matters to voters not just what you stand for but also how you go about standing for it. We can learn from the president that political success requires building a movement and not being trapped by the norms and conventions of existing political organizations. Remember Trump has gotten to where he is not by being an acolyte of Republican orthodoxy but by being a heretic. In the age of loneliness, pro-democracy forces need to give people the sense that they are caught up in a great cause. We can learn from the president that if the pro-democracy movement is to succeed, it needs to offer its own version of constitutional reform. Stop talking about preserving the system and start talking about changing it in ways that will make government responsive and connect it to the lives that people live. The six-month mark in his second term is a good moment to dedicate or rededicate ourselves to that work. What’s giving me hope now Every Friday since April, I have organized a Stand Up for Democracy protest in the town where I live. People show up. They hold signs and come to bear witness, even if what they do will not convert anyone to democracy’s cause. They want to affirm their belief that democracy matters, and they want to do so publicly. Some are fearful, worried that they will somehow be punished for participating, but they show up. In addition, Harvard University’s willingness to resist the Trump administration’s demands that threatened academic freedom and institutional independence set a powerful example. Whether or not the university reaches an agreement with the administration, Harvard’s example will still matter. It is also true, as Axios reports, that protests against Trump administration policies and allies “have attracted millions in the last few months: Tesla Takedown in March, Hands Off! and 50501 in April, May Day, No Kings Day in June, and Free America on Independence Day”. Another mass event, “Good Trouble Lives On,” occurred on 17 July, “commemorating the fifth anniversary of the death of civil rights leader and former Rep John Lewis”. Those events need to happen more frequently than once a month. But they are a start. Axios cites Professor Gloria J Browne-Marshall, who reminds us that “effective protesting often starts with an emotional response to policy or an event, swiftly followed by strategy … The current movement is reaching that second stage”. In that stage, it has a chance to “‘actually make change in the government’.” I think that the seeds of that kind of opposition have been planted. But there is no time to waste if we are to prevent Trump’s political ingenuity from succeeding in permanently reshaping the institutions and practices of our constitutional republic towards authoritarianism.


by Adam Israel in Politics

The Trump administration finalized a significant prisoner exchange with Venezuela on Friday, releasing 10 American citizens wrongfully detained in the country. In return, approximately 250 Venezuelans, previously deported and imprisoned in El Salvador, were sent back to their homeland. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the Americans' release, stating that all wrongfully detained Americans in Venezuela were now free. The freed Americans included Wilbert Joseph Castaneda, Jorge Marcelo Vargas, Lucas Hunter, Jonathan Pagan Gonzalez, Ronald Oribio Quintana, Erick Oribio Quintana, Fabian Buglione Reyes, Renzo Humanchumo Castillo, Juan Jose Faria Bricen, and Danud Hanid Ortiz. The release followed months of negotiations and a controversial mass deportation of Venezuelans to El Salvador in March, where they were held in the notorious CECOT prison. Family members of both the released Americans and the repatriated Venezuelans expressed immense relief and joy. The operation was described as "down to the wire" by a senior administration official, highlighting the complexities and uncertainties involved in negotiating with the Venezuelan regime. The exchange also involved the release of dozens of Venezuelan political prisoners, facilitated by Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, who had proposed the swap earlier this year. Senator Marco Rubio played a key role in the negotiations, maintaining direct contact with President Bukele. President Trump praised Rubio for his efforts. The State Department's Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs (SPEHA) also participated in the logistical aspects of the swap. The successful exchange concludes a chapter marked by controversy and uncertainty, bringing relief to families on both sides of the border.


by Abigail Isaacson in Politics

President Donald Trump signed his landmark tax and spending cuts bill into law on July 4, notching the first major legislative achievement of his second term. Congressional Republicans approved the president’s sweeping agenda bill on an ambitious timeline over the blanket opposition of Democrats, as well as some consternation within the GOP over its impact to the federal deficit and certain government programs. Among its myriad provisions, the package makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts that were set to expire at year’s end and beefs up funding for defense, border control and immigration enforcement. It also enacts a historic reshaping of the nation’s safety net, particularly imposing steep cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. Some of the measures take effect this year – for instance, the expiration of the electric vehicles tax credit and the temporary elimination of taxes on tips and overtime work. Other provisions don’t kick in for several years, notably, after the 2026 midterm elections. Several student loan provisions in the bill will take effect next year. Additionally, one month before the midterm elections, a provision limiting Medicaid eligibility for immigrants will set in. Key parts of the bill — including new work requirements and increased eligibility checks for Medicaid — are set to kick in in the lead up to the 2028 presidential election. Still unclear is when two major changes to the food stamp program will take effect. The US Department of Agriculture said it will issue a memorandum to states about implementing the law, including expanding the work requirement to recipients ages 55 to 64 and to parents of children older than 13, as well as limiting the eligibility of certain legal immigrants.


by Alex Ingram in Politics

The Trump administration has reversed its decision to halt development of a new database, Atlas 15, designed to provide precise flash flood risk estimates for Americans, incorporating the effects of climate change. This reversal follows reports by CNN and the Washington Post, and subsequent discussions between NOAA leadership and Commerce Department officials. Atlas 15 will replace the outdated Atlas 14, which does not account for climate change. The updated database will be crucial for civil engineers, homeowners, and others in assessing flood risk, as global warming increases the frequency and severity of extreme precipitation events. The database will include projections for the likelihood and severity of 100-year and even 1000-year rainfall events under various warming scenarios. While the first phase of Atlas 15, focusing on updated precipitation frequency estimates without climate change projections, is on track for release later this year, the second phase, which incorporates climate change projections, had been paused until now. The administration's initial pause on the climate change component raised concerns about its commitment to climate science, given other recent actions, such as the removal of the climate.gov website and the disbanding of experts working on a national climate assessment. The completion of Atlas 15 will mark a significant step towards recognizing the changing precipitation extremes caused by climate change and enabling better preparedness for future flood events.


by Alex Ingram in Politics

A federal court trial revealed that the State Department held over a dozen meetings with the White House, including Stephen Miller, to discuss student visas. A senior State Department official, John Armstrong, testified about using broad definitions of antisemitism to scrutinize and potentially deport non-citizen students and professors. This included actions based on comments against the Israeli government, support for an arms embargo in Gaza, or calls to end US military aid to Israel. Armstrong stated that the stakes are high, likening potential mistakes to 9/11. The process involved referrals to Homeland Security, investigations, and visa revocations. Memos indicated that the removal orders might face legal challenges due to their connection to protected speech. The case of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University student detained and deported based on an op-ed, protest participation, and loose ties to a pro-Palestinian group, was highlighted. Judge William Young indicated that non-citizens likely have the same First Amendment rights as citizens regarding pure speech. Closing arguments are set to begin.


by Abigail Isaacson in Politics

President Donald Trump has filed a staggering $10 billion defamation lawsuit against media mogul Rupert Murdoch, News Corp, and Dow Jones (parent company of The Wall Street Journal). The lawsuit stems from the WSJ's publication of an alleged 2003 birthday letter from Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which reportedly included a sexually suggestive drawing. Trump vehemently denies the letter's authenticity, claiming the WSJ concocted the story to malign him. The lawsuit targets Murdoch, News Corp executive Robert Thomson, and the two WSJ journalists who authored the report. Trump alleges the defendants failed to provide proof of the letter's authenticity and claims the publication caused significant financial and reputational harm. He has repeatedly attacked the story on his Truth Social platform, calling the WSJ a "useless rag" and vowing to make Murdoch testify. This lawsuit follows Trump's previous defamation lawsuits against other media outlets, resulting in substantial settlements. The timing is noteworthy, coinciding with the Department of Justice's attempt to close the so-called Epstein files, renewing scrutiny of Trump's relationship with Epstein. The lawsuit adds another layer to the already complex relationship between Trump and Murdoch, once allies, now embroiled in a high-stakes legal battle.


by Abigail Isaacson in Politics

The controversy surrounding President Donald Trump's involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation escalated as his administration struggled to fulfill its promise of releasing details about the sex trafficking case. The Wall Street Journal revealed a sexually suggestive letter allegedly written by Trump and included in a birthday album for Epstein. Trump denied authorship, calling the letter "false, malicious, and defamatory." He previously criticized supporters demanding more records from the Epstein probe as "weaklings," despite previously courting their support based on claims of a cover-up protecting wealthy Epstein associates. Trump also shielded Attorney General Pam Bondi from questioning after she retracted claims of an "elite client list" involved in Epstein's crimes and accused Democrats of doctoring files. Despite the administration's attempts to control the narrative, the Epstein saga persists due to internal government conflict, Trump's attacks on his base, and the unexplained decision to keep key documents sealed. Following pressure from lawmakers, Trump reversed course and instructed Bondi to seek court permission to release some grand jury information. However, Bondi's request requires judicial approval, and the administration remains silent on additional evidence collected by federal law enforcement.


by Alfred Ignacio in Politics

The controversy surrounding President Donald Trump's handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation intensifies. The Wall Street Journal revealed a sexually suggestive letter allegedly written by Trump and included in a birthday album for Epstein. Trump denies authorship, calling it "false, malicious, and defamatory," and threatens to sue. He previously criticized supporters demanding more transparency in the Epstein probe, accusing them of being "weaklings." The administration's initial promise to release details on the sex trafficking case has been reversed, angering Trump supporters and leading to infighting within the government. Attorney General Pam Bondi initially stated she would not release additional evidence but later said she would seek court permission to release some grand jury information. The letter, reportedly collected by Ghislaine Maxwell, contains text surrounding a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with a suggestive message. Vice President JD Vance criticized the Wall Street Journal for publishing the letter. The White House rejected calls for a special counsel investigation into the matter. Trump blamed Democrats for the controversy, accusing them of doctoring files. The saga has impacted House legislative efforts, with Democrats using procedural moves to force votes on releasing the documents. Trump's past ties to Epstein are well-documented, including video footage showing them together at Mar-a-Lago. Previously released files included a deposition from an accuser who spent time with Epstein at Trump's Atlantic City casino but didn't accuse Trump of wrongdoing.